The effects of poverty on natural resources in Ilkerin village Arusha district, Tanzania

dc.contributor.authorEdward, Julius
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-10T07:28:28Z
dc.date.available2020-01-10T07:28:28Z
dc.date.issued2008-11
dc.descriptionA research report submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of a degree in bachelor of science in environmental management of Kampala international universityen_US
dc.description.abstractThis section summarizes the effects of poverty on natural resources in Ilkerin village, Arusha district, Tanzania. The research analyzed the following objectives; finding out the main causes of poverty, the effects of poverty on natural resources and possible measures to alleviate poverty. The methods of raw data collection during the research included selection of sample of 150 respondents out of the total population of 1234 using a simple random sampling technique. Questionnaires, interview guide and observation were used. 270 (21.9%) out of 300 Naromoru village population live under the poverty line, Lengj ape has 265(21%) out of 270 people living under the poverty line, Kisongo has 300 (24.3%), Kiranyi has 150 (100%) and Losipa 195(15.8%) people live under the poverty line. It is tabled that out of 1234 total population in Ilkerin village, 1180 live under the poverty line making the figure of 95.6%. Concerning the causes of poverty, 120 (80%) of the respondents agreed that the area has a high population growth while 30(20%) said the population growth is not high. 140(93.3%) of the respondents do not use modern technology while 10(6.7%) of the respondents use little of the modern ploughing and sowing technology. 130 (86.7%) of the respondents agreed that the area has poor soils which do not support agriculture while 20(13.3%) said the soils were good. The 20 respondents were from areas near the rivers. Jovin A.Batukari, (2000) in the publication titled “cooperatives and poverty alleviation”, the metrological report stated that in the last five years the climate on which the country’s agriculture dependent on, has been fluctuating and this has led to the decline of output since the farmer has not been in position to predict the seasons as they used to do. 5(3.3%) agreed to having enough land for their agricultural and other productive activities whereas 145(96.7) said the land is not enough for agriculture and other productive activities. 110 (73.3%) of the the respondents agreed that poverty affects forests, 30 (20%) disagreed and 10 (6.7%) were not sure of either two. 120 (80%) of the respondents said that fisher men do not use proper discriminative nets due to the demand of fish in the area which is a result of famine, only 30(20%) of respondents supported fisher men to be selling mature fish. basing on the findings, wild animals have decreased in numbers due to poaching and hunting in both gazetted areas and forests. basing on the findings, high birth rates, poor cultivation technology and land shortage led to a high poverty rates among the population in the village resulting to natural resource extinction habits. despite the high levels of natural resource extinction, the government should not give up on sensitization of the population about the importance of natural resources, teach them better farming methods, educate them on the population control and construct dams for irrigation to save the, soils.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/6732
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKampala International University, School of Engineering and Applied Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectPovertyen_US
dc.subjectNatural resourcesen_US
dc.subjectIlkerin village- Arusha districten_US
dc.titleThe effects of poverty on natural resources in Ilkerin village Arusha district, Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Julius Edward.pdf
Size:
4.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full text
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: