Makerere: Crisis management versus management by crisis

dc.contributor.authorMao, Nobert
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T07:11:26Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T07:11:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-17
dc.descriptionDaily Monitor February 17, 2019. Page 10.en_US
dc.description.abstractLet's state our argument at the outset. Three things drive conflict in Makerere. First is personal behaviour of the conflicting parties. Second is structural factors. Third is communication factors.Our view is that the way Makerere is structured makes it conflict prone and in the absence of inbuilt conflict management and resolution mechanisms it will always be in turmoil.The current university structure is based on 'clientelism'. The bosses have politically well placed overlords who call the tunes thus downgrading administration into a puppet show. We have heard stories of appointments and promotions based not on merit but on other considerations including nepotism.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/1636
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDaily Monitoren_US
dc.subjectMakerereen_US
dc.subjectCrisis managementen_US
dc.subjectManagement by crisisen_US
dc.titleMakerere: Crisis management versus management by crisisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files