Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparing the Effects of Chinese and Traditional Official Finance on State Repression and Public Demonstrations in Africa
Authors: Che, Afa’anwi Ma’abo
Keywords: World Bank
Chinese African Research
Policy Making
Public Demonstrations in Africa
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Johns Hopkings University
Citation: Afa’anwi Ma’abo Che. 2020. Comparing the Effects of Chinese and Traditional Official Finance on State Repression and Public Demonstrations in Africa. Working Paper No. 2020/42. China Africa Research Initiative, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC. Retrieved from
Series/Report no.: Policy Brief;Working Paper No. 2020/42.
Abstract: There is little, non-biased, existing literature on the effects of Chinese official finance on state repression and public demonstrations. As such, this paper employs standard multiple regression analysis to assess how different attributes of Chinese and traditional official finance predict variations in rates of repression and demonstrations in Africa. Although Chinese and traditional official flows have more similarities than differences in their effects on repression, there is a distinct positive and statistically significant relationship between aggregate traditional official finance and public demonstrations. Looking at regional distributions of foreign financed projects and public demonstrations in Cameroon (receiving predominantly Chinese official finance) and Uganda (receiving mainly traditional aid), I find evidence to support a negative correlation between Chinese official finance and public demonstrations on the one hand and a positive correlation between traditional official finance and public demonstrations on the other. However, when specifically analyzing demonstrations against foreign funded development projects this paper reveals, through interviews on selected Chinese and World Bank-funded projects in Cameroon, that owing to less stringent project impact assessments, impact management standards, and the absence of complaint management offices, Chinese-funded projects are more prone to anti-project demonstrations.
Description: The papers in this Working Paper series have undergone only limited review and may be updated, corrected or withdrawn. Please contact the corresponding author directly with comments or questions about this paper.
Appears in Collections:Administrators and Managers Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SAIS-CARI working paper.pdf607.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.