Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/5470
Title: Clindamycin resistance among methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus isolated from human and respective household swine in greater Kabale Region—South Western Uganda
Authors: Baguma, Andrew
Musinguzi, Benson
Mpeirwe, Moses
Bazira, Joel
Keywords: Clindamycin resistance
Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus
Household swine
Kabale Region
South Western Uganda
Issue Date: Sep-2019
Publisher: Scientific Research Publishing
Citation: How to cite this paper: Baguma, A., Musinguzi, B., Mpeirwe, M. and Bazira, J. (2019) Clindamycin Resistance among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Human and Respective House- hold Swine in Greater Kabale Region— South Western Uganda. Advances in Infectious Diseases, 9, 285-294. https://doi.org/10.4236/aid.2019.94022
Series/Report no.: ;Advances in Infectious Diseases, 2019, 9, 285-294 https://www.scirp.org/journal/aid
Abstract: Introduction: S. aureus is recognized as the common cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B (MLSB) is thought to be alternative therapies against MRSA infections. Clindamycin is the most favored agent because of exceptional pharmacokinetic characteristics. However, increasing resistance to clindamycin among MRSA strains is a serious challenge. The current study investigated the profile of clindamycin resistance among MRSA isolates from Humans, and their respective livestock (in particular swine) using D-test in greater Kabale region. Materials and Methods: Three hundred phenotypic MRSA isolates previously isolated from Humans and swine were confirmed by mecA PCR. We performed D-test using erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) discs in accordance to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol. Results: Of all 300 MRSA isolates, 6% (n = 18) were sensitive to Erythromycin and Clindamycin (S). The rate of inducible clindamycin resis-tance (iMLSB) was 42% (n = 125) and 38% (n = 115) was resistance to both Erythromycin and clindamycin (cMLSB). However, 14% (n = 42) were resistant to erythromycin but sensitive to clindamycin (MS) without “D” zone negative. Conclusion: Clindamycin resistance (both cMLSB and iMLSB) among MRSA was high and “D” test should be adopted routinely during antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion testing to rapidly detect iMLSB and cMLSB.
Description: 10.4236/aid.2019.94022 Dec. 12, 2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/5470
ISSN: ISSN Online: 2164-2656
ISSN Print: 2164-2648
Appears in Collections:Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Benson Publication 3 on Clindamycin.pdfFull text1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.